saving-coffin
saving-coffin
saving-coffin
saving-coffin

Poetry News For January 20, 2008

Poetry News:

  1. “The Poem of a Life,” Mark Scroggins’s terrific new biography, never strays far from Zukofsky the poet.
  2. Over the past 100 years Milton’s standing has declined more steeply than that of any other great English poet
  3. City officials see Cornish as a poet of the people, someone who will reach across racial and socioeconomic lines to promote literacy through poetry
  4. Poet Li-Young Lee achieves transcendence in works such as ‘To Hold’
  5. Maya Angelou’s poem in praise of Hillary
  6. Lilya would become the muse for Mayakovsky’s poetry for the next 20 years, and the couple a key presence in the Soviet Union’s new literary and artistic movements
  7. Brian Turner had a master’s in fine arts degree tucked in his ruck sack when he enlisted at the age of 30
  8. Poetry turns out to be a better survival tool than you might think
  9. Gloomy poets are rarely very good, and good poets rarely very gloomy

So what’s the deal? Why do the mainstream media hardly ever do articles or reviews about women poets? It is often hard to find ANY article to link to.

Are there more men poets than women poets? (When I got my MFA, the poetry students were mostly women.) Are men poets simply better poets than women poets? More interesting? Better at self-promotion maybe? Do articles in which the subject has a penis make for increased sales or something? Are men poets more likely to get published by a large press? What? Is? The? Deal? Here?

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
This entry was posted on Sunday, January 20th, 2008 at 12:45 pm and is filed under Poetry News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

11 comments

 1 

Why aren’t more women poets in the public eye? Well, isn’t that true across the board?
Sports, politics, just about everything aside from Britney Spears and daytime TV?

This is partly why I voted for Hillary Clinton — the only woman candidate running for president in a major party EVER. If elected, she’ll help place more women poets in the public sphere :->

January 20th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
 2 

Um, sexism?

January 20th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
 3 

Jilly, I’m going to take your post and run with it.

And I have no answers, especially because I’m sure women buy 50 percent of what’s on the market. Not sure why we don’t do a better job of supporting women, in general.

Of course, the Maya Angelou article/poem doesn’t make me feel any better about the state of women and poetry.

January 20th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
 4 

Jilly,

This has been on my mind too. Especially as I read Poetry Daily news. Many more men than women. I don’t get it.

I’m listening to what others think…

January 20th, 2008 at 6:01 pm
 5 

Ooh, also, more women querying pubs about articles and reviews for other women’s books. I’m trying my best, and there are probably a lot of women out there doing their best too, but I still don’t think it happens enough.

January 21st, 2008 at 12:07 am
 6 

Just a note in regard to one of the comments above: Shirley Chisholm ran for president as a Democrat in 1972; there is a great film about her run which is available on video from PBS (http://www.pbs.org/pov/pov2005/chisholm/).

I think there is still a boys’ club, and men publish and promote what they take seriously, and I think women’s writing is not always taken seriously. This is especially true when it comes to work by/about queer women. Compare the amount of gay men who are widely published to the amount of lesbians. Sigh.

January 21st, 2008 at 12:32 am
 7 

Hi Jilly,

Whew, you touched one of my buttons and I swear smoke was coming off my keys when I responded at January’s place.

Anywhoo, my short answer is if we want change we have to be the change. Who are we reading? What are we buying? Who do we go to hear read? Me, unabashedly biased - women. Hell, I have to remember to read men. I run a lit group. Need ask our focus? I run our community library. Guess what 90% of our collection is? Ask me about my personal library. I walk the walk.

And don’t get me wrong, I want to always read quality work, and there are plenty of women with plenty to say and we say it well.

And thanks Mandy for mentioning Chisholm. She was the first black and first woman candidate.

January 21st, 2008 at 10:40 am
 8 

1. Stop reading the mainstream media, which is 100% junk for money.
2. Ignore men — if I don’t meet another man in my life, it will be okay with me.
3. Read women.
4. Blog women.
5. Spend time with women.

January 21st, 2008 at 3:09 pm
 9 

Mandy, Shirley Chisholm it is — my aplogies and error. I remember her running when I was a kid ;) 162 delegates! My mistake . . . I guess we can say Clinton has the best chance at winning to date?

January 21st, 2008 at 5:30 pm
 10 

I’m late to the discussion, as usual.

A few months ago, I think it was at the Ploughshares blog, someone (an editor) was saying that they got many more submissions from men than women.

And I know that I, personally, don’t tend to submit work anywhere. I know that I should, but it just never seems to be that important to me.

So, in a nutshell, I (and women like me) am the problem!

Julie

January 26th, 2008 at 8:28 am
 11 

I’m the problem too, Julie. I haven’t subbed much the past year. Partially because of the crap of life, partially because the po-biz is a bit icky to me.

But I’m turning over a new leaf! (Whenever I get this manuscript finished.)

January 28th, 2008 at 9:55 am

One Trackback/Ping

  1. More on the lack of press for women poets | Poetry Hut Blog: Poetry News    Jan 22 2008 / 9am:

    [...] re my post from a few days ago. There are other discussions about this over here and over here and over here and over here [...]

saving-coffin
saving-coffin
saving-coffin
saving-coffin